Here's the charming and delightful Laura* on quasi-harlot Nancy Pelosi. Now THIS is class!
You think the pictures of dead bin Ladin would be gruesome? To put it in perspective, have a look at Janet Napolitano.
Here, Laura blows the lid on Obama's loan guarantees for Brazilian off-shore drilling.
Oh, wait . . . that's a god-damned lie.
But here, she points out that the stimulus didn't create any jobs, and didn't help the economy.
Shit. That's a lie, too.
That's only going back a few months, and only relying on a single source. Clearly, this game could go on for hours, but I've grown weary of it all ready.
Media Matters has a point, when they say: "However, being progressive means recognizing that Ingraham -- no matter how much we disagree with her views -- deserves to have her commentary evaluated on its merits and should not be attacked with sexist language."
Well, we've done a bit evaluating on the merits, and discovered there are none. But why pussy-foot on the language? We know what a media whore is. Is there any reason to think that Laura Ingraham is anything other than a right-wing talk slut? Maybe he should have just called her a mealy-mouthed, lying piece of shit. There's no way to infer sexism from that.
* When I was playing one of these clips, my lovely wife asked, "Who is that? It sounds like a man." That's when I noticed that she looks even more like a man in drag than that other right-wing talk slut. (Seriously - tell me