On 10/30, in an open thread at AB, I posted a summary of my experience (up to that time) in commenting at Confounded Interest, a blog by GMU Prof Anthony Sandler. The CI post in question has since been taken down.
This generated an interesting discussion (that I unfortunately lost track of) with some links to good information that I don't want to lose. Keeping a link to that post is one of the reasons for this post.
Another is to show some interesting data that mcwop provided:
1817-1821: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 29%. Depression began 1819.
1823-1836: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 99%. Depression began 1837.
1852-1857: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 59%. Depression began 1857.
1867-1873: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 27%. Depression began 1873.
1880-1893: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 57%. Depression began 1893.
1920-1930: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 36%. Depression began 1929.
1998-2001: U. S. Federal Debt reduced 9%. Recession began 2001
2004-2007: U. S. Deficit Reduced 61% (from $413B to $160B) Great Recession began 2008
I had read somewhere (attribution lost) that balancing the budget was the route to recession, with IIRC a six for six record. The above list show 8 such examples.
Food for thought.
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/tny_au_xx_usoz_4.gif)
Friday, November 22, 2024, Joe Marangell
14 hours ago
5 comments:
L. Randall Wray wrote an article about this very topic:
http://www.nextnewdeal.net/federal-budget-not-household-budget-heres-why?author=83
I'm not sure whether you're seeing cause or effect, though. That is, recessions / depressions cause the deficit to rise, while booms cause the deficit to decline (well, if things are being done right), so what you're seeing may be effect, not cause. Just sayin'. Though I agree that trying to reduce the deficit during an economic downturn is just nuts for way too many reasons.
- Badtux the "Correlation is not causation" Penguin
I certainly understand that correlation is not causation. In fact, If there is any way to prove causation, I'd like to know about it.
The possibilities I can think of are -
1) causation
2) coincidence
3) unidentified common cause
4) reversed cause and effect
Did I miss anything?
But, let's assume or the moment that the list is both accurate and complete, and that big reductions in Fed Debt always and everywhere led to recessions. If so, then you have a very strong case for causation.
Cheers!
JzB
Jazz, you may be remembering one of these?
http://www.asymptosis.com/the-meme-that-refuses-to-die-government-debt-must-be-paid-back.html
http://www.asymptosis.com/does-reducing-the-federal-debt-cause-financial-collapse.html
http://www.asymptosis.com/this-time-is-different-federal-debt-didnt-dive-before-the-depression.html
Steve -
Yeah, thanks.
I think I missed this time it's different, though.
Lots of food for thought here.
Cheers!
JzB
Post a Comment