I've decided I never want Chris Christie to be my bridge partner.
Showing posts with label random thought. Show all posts
Showing posts with label random thought. Show all posts
Saturday, February 1, 2014
Monday, August 19, 2013
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Bumper Sticker of the Day
Seen on Washington St. downtown Royal oak, MI.
$10,000 Reward
Wanted Dead or Alive
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Random Thoughts - Republican Violence Against Women
A small number of Republicans voted for the
Violence Against Women Act.
Then they actually read the thing and discovered
it was prevention, not encouragement.
Friday, February 15, 2013
What the Hell?!? Friday - Just Cruisin' Edition
A Cruise Missal is a prayer book taken along in case you need divine intervention to survive the event.
~ : ~ : ~
Life is a Cabaret
Be glad it's not a Carnival
Labels:
criticism,
current events,
random thought,
snark,
WTH? Friday
Monday, February 11, 2013
Random Thought du Jour
It would be a great step forward to have an African, Asian or Hispanic Pope.
But I'll be content if the next one simply isn't a Nazi.
But I'll be content if the next one simply isn't a Nazi.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Quotes of the Day, With a Dash of WTH?!?
A man must be orthodox upon most things, or he will never even have time to preach his own heresy.
-- G. K. Chesterton
Quoted by John Holbo, at CT, where (in comment #13) Jim Harrison adds:
Rhetoric, after all, has always been about making the worse case defeat the better.
But (of course) I wholly misunderstand (you remember my definition of misunderstand) rhetoric.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
The Real World of Real Work
I was reminded again of this, while reading this comment from Steve, at his own blog (following Art's link.)
Which is tangential to the topic Steve, et. al. were discussing, but keys right into something that I was thinking about. I have two degrees in Chemistry, B. S. and M.S. I worked in industry from early June of 1968 until the end of November in 2008 - a tad over 40 years. If you aggregated all the time I spent doing actual chemistry, it might total a few months; certainly it was far less than two years. If you aggregated all the time I spent doing things where my knowledge of chemistry directly informed my ability to function, it would total somewhere in the range of 15 to 20 years. Dealing with Mechanical Engineers threw this into stark relief. A typical Mechanical Engineer simply would have been incapable of doing my job. Just as I would have been incapable of doing her's - for that 30 to 50% of the time, unless I received some amount of specific training.* Also, I'll posit that specific engineering knowledge was a relevant enabler to the M.E. no more than 50% of the time.
Here is a related anecdote. Some of my musician friends are employed as computer programmers. Their education is in music. Their employer specifically seeks musicians because training them is especially easy. There is some sort of fit between the musician's mind and the tasks to be performed.
My point is that doing something other than what you were educated to do is not a misuse of talent, except in the most egregious examples - frex PhD' physicists driving cabs, Engineers delivering pizzas, Accountants digging ditches, Economists doing economics. (Sorry, couldn't resist the dig.)
Realistically, your education does not prepare you for the world of work, and most specifically, the chance of it preparing you for the job you actually get is almost vanishingly small.
__________________________________________
* Some of this is skill and training related, and some has to do with individual brain idiosyncrasies, interest level and willingness to learn. I'll bet I could learn the M.E.'s job with very little additional training. Engineering is applied math, and I'm reasonably good at that. Not so the other way around. At the briefest mention of anything remotely chemical, the M.E.'s eyes glaze over. Persist, and they will run, screaming, from the room.
My sister, after abandoning the Berkeley Phd astrophysics program, ended up [with no programming experience] programming those Visa mainframes that process billions of transactions a night — in assembler! I asked her once if she used any of her higher math from college, calculus and such. “No,” she said, “we pretty much just add and subtract. On rare occasions we’ll get really abstruse and multiply or divide.
Which is tangential to the topic Steve, et. al. were discussing, but keys right into something that I was thinking about. I have two degrees in Chemistry, B. S. and M.S. I worked in industry from early June of 1968 until the end of November in 2008 - a tad over 40 years. If you aggregated all the time I spent doing actual chemistry, it might total a few months; certainly it was far less than two years. If you aggregated all the time I spent doing things where my knowledge of chemistry directly informed my ability to function, it would total somewhere in the range of 15 to 20 years. Dealing with Mechanical Engineers threw this into stark relief. A typical Mechanical Engineer simply would have been incapable of doing my job. Just as I would have been incapable of doing her's - for that 30 to 50% of the time, unless I received some amount of specific training.* Also, I'll posit that specific engineering knowledge was a relevant enabler to the M.E. no more than 50% of the time.
Here is a related anecdote. Some of my musician friends are employed as computer programmers. Their education is in music. Their employer specifically seeks musicians because training them is especially easy. There is some sort of fit between the musician's mind and the tasks to be performed.
My point is that doing something other than what you were educated to do is not a misuse of talent, except in the most egregious examples - frex PhD' physicists driving cabs, Engineers delivering pizzas, Accountants digging ditches, Economists doing economics. (Sorry, couldn't resist the dig.)
Realistically, your education does not prepare you for the world of work, and most specifically, the chance of it preparing you for the job you actually get is almost vanishingly small.
__________________________________________
* Some of this is skill and training related, and some has to do with individual brain idiosyncrasies, interest level and willingness to learn. I'll bet I could learn the M.E.'s job with very little additional training. Engineering is applied math, and I'm reasonably good at that. Not so the other way around. At the briefest mention of anything remotely chemical, the M.E.'s eyes glaze over. Persist, and they will run, screaming, from the room.
Labels:
education,
employment,
life,
music,
non-meshing gears,
random thought
Sunday, September 25, 2011
Sunday, September 11, 2011
September 11 Thoughts
I'm a patriotic guy - a real patriot who actually loves his country knowing full well that it is full of flaws and imperfections, not a phony who places some partisan ideal above the good of the country - as you have seen for several years now from the Repugnicant party, nor a flag-waving purblind zealot. So I wonder about how my countrymen react on this day.
I'm not much of a fan of the Zits cartoon, but if I could have embedded today's entry here I would have. It's thoughtful, poignant, and can interpreted in a variety of ways. SoBe looks at 9/11 in a way that would not have occurred to me, but I think she gets it about right.
Yes it was a tragedy. Maybe even a day that will long live in infamy. And we shouldn't forget. Not that anyone really can. But we take too many of the wrong messages from the event, and our country's misbegotten reactions to it. I will leave pondering those things as an exercise for the interested reader.
And we are wallowing in 9/11-itis. Every sports event of the weekend had some ceremonial remembrance. It's all over the newspapers and television. I don't know how much of this is genuine, how much of it is knee-jerk hearding behavior, how much is exploitation, how much is sensationalism, and how much is cynical commercialism. So I'm really torn about how to react.
But I don't think this wallowing is healthy.
.
I'm not much of a fan of the Zits cartoon, but if I could have embedded today's entry here I would have. It's thoughtful, poignant, and can interpreted in a variety of ways. SoBe looks at 9/11 in a way that would not have occurred to me, but I think she gets it about right.
Yes it was a tragedy. Maybe even a day that will long live in infamy. And we shouldn't forget. Not that anyone really can. But we take too many of the wrong messages from the event, and our country's misbegotten reactions to it. I will leave pondering those things as an exercise for the interested reader.
And we are wallowing in 9/11-itis. Every sports event of the weekend had some ceremonial remembrance. It's all over the newspapers and television. I don't know how much of this is genuine, how much of it is knee-jerk hearding behavior, how much is exploitation, how much is sensationalism, and how much is cynical commercialism. So I'm really torn about how to react.
But I don't think this wallowing is healthy.
.
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
Quote of the Day
"Ars longa, vita brevis, occasio praeceps, experimentum periculosum, iudicium difficile." - Hippocrates
Questions:
Why is this quote from the ancient Greek "Father of Medicine" passed down to us in Latin translation?
Why do we usually only get the "Ars longa, vita brevis" part, which might suggest rather a different meaning than the entire phrase?
If this can be rendered into English as 'life is short, the art (craft/skill) long, opportunity fleeting, experiment treacherous, judgment difficult', would you interpret the meaning as, 'it takes a long time to acquire and perfect one's expertise (in, say, medicine) and one has but a short time in which to do it'.
And couldn't this be pretty well be summed up as, "Ars longa, vita brevis"
H/T to Argyle at The Corner
.
Sunday, April 10, 2011
A Thought about Karl Smith
I find myself in frequent disagreement with Karl Smith. This is no surprise, really, since he is a free-market ideologue with quasi-libertarian tendencies (not that there's anything wrong with that.) I try to be pragmatic rather than dogmatic, and do not share his belief system.
Karl posts at MB more frequently than either Niklas or Adam (on whom I have given up, and will not waste my time reading.) Karl is a bright - possibly brilliant - guy. But many of his posts are poorly conceived, poorly thought through, or simply fatuous. I scratch my head over this.
It seems especially odd to me, since I put a lot of thought, word-smithing, proof-reading, and even work into my posts. Whether it's actually good thought and fruitful work, I'll leave to my readers to decide; but it is certainly an attempt to think hard and get something right.
I've concluded that for Karl, blogging does not serve the same function that it does for me. My guess is that he just throws stuff out there as it occurs to him, without regard for quality or even sense. It's a test site for ideas, somewhat like brain-storming, rather than a forum for imparting thoughtful communication. Why have a critical filter, when your readers - who are taking it all quite seriously - will do this part of your thinking for you, and likely in ways that you'd never think of yourself? There are some kernels of knowledge in there, but the chaff to wheat ratio has driven me to this conclusion.
I think this makes Karl unique among the econ bloggers I read. Even Tyler Cowan, whom I read seldom and likely would agree with even more rarely (for reasons cited above,) seems serious and thoughtful about his posts. Not so, Karl. At least not always.
Or am I all wet?
.
Karl posts at MB more frequently than either Niklas or Adam (on whom I have given up, and will not waste my time reading.) Karl is a bright - possibly brilliant - guy. But many of his posts are poorly conceived, poorly thought through, or simply fatuous. I scratch my head over this.
It seems especially odd to me, since I put a lot of thought, word-smithing, proof-reading, and even work into my posts. Whether it's actually good thought and fruitful work, I'll leave to my readers to decide; but it is certainly an attempt to think hard and get something right.
I've concluded that for Karl, blogging does not serve the same function that it does for me. My guess is that he just throws stuff out there as it occurs to him, without regard for quality or even sense. It's a test site for ideas, somewhat like brain-storming, rather than a forum for imparting thoughtful communication. Why have a critical filter, when your readers - who are taking it all quite seriously - will do this part of your thinking for you, and likely in ways that you'd never think of yourself? There are some kernels of knowledge in there, but the chaff to wheat ratio has driven me to this conclusion.
I think this makes Karl unique among the econ bloggers I read. Even Tyler Cowan, whom I read seldom and likely would agree with even more rarely (for reasons cited above,) seems serious and thoughtful about his posts. Not so, Karl. At least not always.
Or am I all wet?
.
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Haiku Wednesday - Crabby
CRABBY!
(Three very different and unrelated takes on the theme)
(Three very different and unrelated takes on the theme)
I
Today* I am one
Year away from Medicare
So - why be crabby?
II
The least happy dwarf
Living up to his name. Why
So crabby, Grumpy?
III
Obama lets down
His base - AGAIN! - but can't get
Labels:
health care,
old age,
poetry,
politics,
random thought
Friday, November 19, 2010
What The Hell?!? Friday - Random Thought Edition
Friday, October 15, 2010
What The Hell?!? Friday - Random Thought Edition
At rehearsal the other night, I had a strange awareness of the bone in my left upper arm, but not the right, that occurred on the 2nd and 4th counts of a measure, but not the 1st and 3rd.
This is my askew, off-beat sense of humerus.
.
This is my askew, off-beat sense of humerus.
.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Random Thought
On the universal applicability of Massage Therapy
During my massage session this morning, the therapist mentioned that if you use your body, you will have knots in your muscles. She then added that if you don't use your body, you will have knots in your muscles.
Thinking then upon the life styles of the laborers and the indolent, along with ancient wisdom that it rains equally on the rich and the poor, I came up with this.
The haves have knots,
and
The have-nots have knots.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/tny_au_xx_usoz_4.gif)
