We've already seen in previous installments of this series that since about 1980, I, corporate profits have soared, II, the slice of profits going to finance has soared even more, and III, wages have stagnated. Here we see what corporations have done with all that money. There is a limited selection set: pay taxes, distribute as dividends, pay down debt, invest, make acquisitions, speculate, and hold as cash.
Here is a look at taxes through 2008 and dividends through 2010, as percentages of profits; data from BEA table 7.16, lines 19, 20 and 38. For my purposes, profits are divided among taxes, dividends, and all the other things mentioned above, which I'll call the Residual.
Dividends/ Profits are in green; Taxes/Profits in red. I've added 13 year moving averages to clarify the trends over time. The Dividend percentage bottomed in 1978 at 20.6%. I've marked that year on both curves with a yellow dot. After that, dividend payments took off sharply and have been mostly in the 40 to 50 % range since 1989. The tax rate on dividends was reduced to 15% in 2003, also marked with a yellow dot, but I don't think that change has had much effect on dividend payout. The gyrations in the payout percentage since 2003 are largely due to the denominator affect, as profitability increased after the 2001-2 recession, and plummeted during the recent Great Recession. Notably, 2010 profits are the highest ever.
The tax payout drop lagged the dividend increase by several years, and didn't start dropping until 1987. In 1986, the tax payout rate was 45.2%. After a sharp drop to 27.7% in 1992, the payout rate increased throughout the Clinton administration, topping at 34.5% in 2000. Then, there was another sharp drop. It has since leveled off, averaging 25% since 2004.
In 1978, the 13 year averages were 24.2% for dividends and 42.4% for taxes. Those averages are now
This is not only "Starve the Beast" in action, it is a massive redistribution of wealth into the hands of those who already have the most. Say what you will about the relative efficiencies of the private and public sectors in using resources, the public sector places money into the hands of people who will spend it and keep the economy moving. The private sector largely funnels it into rent seeking.
For the sake of completeness, here is a look at the Residual - as defined above - with a 13 year moving average and a best fit straight trend line.
This provides a partial explanation for Jon Hammond's observation that net corporate investment has been down over the duration. There is less residual to invest.
Bottom line: Corporate profits have been skewed to dividend payments, to the detriment of worker salaries, government tax revenues, and corporate investment.
Update: Cross posted at Angry Bear.