I've been reluctant to comment on the shooting of Michael Brown because so much is not known, and so much of what has been thought to be known is either speculative or irrelevant.
But I am now prepared to say a few things.
Whenever an atrocity is committed, two things always happen -
-- Real information is suppressed
-- The victim is demonized
We don't know - and may NEVER know - if the killing of Michael Brown was an actual atrocity. But we see the atrocity cover-up-and-deflect scenario played out here, exactly according to script.
There's a third thing that happens, which is an amalgam of the first two - the spreading of misinformation that is either intended to be exculpatory of the person(s) committing the atrocity, or damning of the victim.
So it is with the fractured orbital bone fiction perpetrated by the right wing media and spread so far and wide in recent days.
Evidently this story originated with Gateway Pundit, probably the least reliable of all the rabid right wing propagandists on the web. In this instance the level of deceit is astounding. It is actual fraud.
It was then spread by first, the Murdoch owned New York Post, followed quickly by Murdoch's Fox News, and thence like wild-fire to a wider population hungry to have their facile and too often racist biases confirmed.
This story smelled very odd to me the first time I saw it. If the officer had a serious injury, that would have been known immediately, since he got X-rays shortly after the event. And since the cops were eager to smear Michael Brown by releasing the completely irrelevant security video from inside the store, it's hard to believe they would have held back something that at least marginally tends to make the shooting seem more justifiable.
Then the whole thing got a whole lot stinkier when I checked out the sources. As always, critical thinking and a slow walk to judgment are advised.
LA Times 101 - first time submissions
11 hours ago