tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290163255778893789.post4366479359881991033..comments2024-03-16T05:19:07.061-04:00Comments on Retirement Blues: Tuesday Market ActionJazzbumpahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07337490817307473659noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290163255778893789.post-77015433994772003532011-08-23T19:10:35.456-04:002011-08-23T19:10:35.456-04:00Right, and no embarrassment. The ratios of adjace...Right, and no embarrassment. The ratios of adjacent numbers in the sequence approach 0.618 and its reciprocal, 1.618. There is a lot of strangeness surrounding the golden ratio. <br /><br />Frex, (0.618)^2 = .382 = 1-.618.<br /><br />Start with any two numbers and build a sequence where the next entry is the sum of the previous two. The ratio of S(n) to S(n+1) approaches 0.618.<br /><br />Actually, the real time stock analysis is pretty risky. I hope I'm not embarrassing MYSELF.<br /><br />Cheers!<br />JzBJazzbumpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07337490817307473659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290163255778893789.post-21557238526615131162011-08-23T18:22:55.237-04:002011-08-23T18:22:55.237-04:00"Curiouser and curiouser."
Nice, Alice!..."Curiouser and curiouser."<br /><br />Nice, Alice!<br /><br />Jaz, your explanatory post *definitely* helps me understand what you are saying in this post. EXcellent. Thanks.<br /><br />50% and 61.8% are Fibbonacci numbers I now presume. 1 1 2 3 5 8 13... the next number is the sum of the most recent two numbers. As I recall... Hope I'm not embarrassing myself!<br />1/2 = 50%<br />13/21 is closer to 0.618 than...<br />I forget.<br />But DEFiitely, I get it better now. Thanks, Jazz.The Arthurianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16501331051089400601noreply@blogger.com